Legal Opinion

Frazier v. H.C. Price/Ciri Construction JV

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1990No. S-2902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

Richard Frazier, an injured worker, gave notice of his intention to introduce into evidence before the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) a written medical report prepared at the request and expense of his employer. After the employer asserted a right to cross-examine the authors of the report, the Board held that Frazier should bear the costs of the cross-examination. We reverse.

*104I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Richard Frazier was injured on the job when he inhaled smoke from burning polyurethane foam. His employer, H.C. Price/CIRI Construction Joint Venture…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. H. E. Collins and Joetta Collins, Surviving Parents and Personal Representatives of Karen Collins, Deceased v. Wayne CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Argonaut Southwest Insurance Company v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Commercial Union Companies v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Russell v. State ex rel. GrimesCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
  5. General Electric Co. v. HopkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clement v. FultonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Clement v. FultonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kade Michael Woodell v. Alaska Regional HospitalAlaska Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API