Legal Opinion

Clement v. Fulton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 2005No. S-11077PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Mary Fulton died several days after a hospital allegedly failed to diagnose and *929treat her medical condition, leukemia. She was survived by her husband and two minor children. The children contend that the superior court misallocated the wrongful death settlement proceeds paid by the hospital. Because the court did not clearly err in rejecting the children’s assertion that Mary Fulton’s life expectancy would have been only one year even if she had been correctly diagnosed, we affirm the allocation.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Mary Fulton was the primary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Morrison v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Levar v. ElkinsAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Walden v. Department of TransportationAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Horsford v. Estate of HorsfordAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DenisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Clement v. FultonAlaska Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Kenai Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DenisonAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API