State v. Herring
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Defendants argue that the trial court erred in denying their motions to dismiss the charges against them based on insufficiency of the State’s evidence. Viewed in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence tends to show that on 19 July 1983, the defendants, along with Mark Watts, David Stowell and Darrell *271Wooten, met in defendant Meyer’s home in Leland, North Carolina. Defendant Meyer suggested going to Wilmington to “roll a queer.” Departing in three vehicles, the men proceeded to the Front Street area. Mark Watts met the victim, Donnie Canady, in this area, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. MacKSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. BraceySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MontfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- State v. TuckCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- State v. HerringCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
- State v. Young-KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.