Legal Opinion

State v. Tuck

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 6, 2005No. COA04-1077PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Albert Hilton Tuck, Jr. (“defendant”), appeals his conviction for six counts of robbery with a dangerous weapon. For the reasons discussed herein, we hold that defendant received a trial free of prejudicial error.

The State’s evidence presented at trial tends to show the following: On 26 November 2003, June Matal (“Matal”) and Lois Ellen Smarella (“Smarella”) were at Suzio’s at Six Forks Station, a women’s boutique located in Raleigh, North Carolina. Defendant entered the store, pointed a gun at Matal and Smarella, and ordered Smarella to open the store’s cash register.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API