State v. Tuck
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.
Albert Hilton Tuck, Jr. (“defendant”), appeals his conviction for six counts of robbery with a dangerous weapon. For the reasons discussed herein, we hold that defendant received a trial free of prejudicial error.
The State’s evidence presented at trial tends to show the following: On 26 November 2003, June Matal (“Matal”) and Lois Ellen Smarella (“Smarella”) were at Suzio’s at Six Forks Station, a women’s boutique located in Raleigh, North Carolina. Defendant entered the store, pointed a gun at Matal and Smarella, and ordered Smarella to open the store’s cash register.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. GraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. ColeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- State v. MitchellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.