Legal Opinion

Reading Co. v. Sobelman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1940No. Appeal, 181PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Cunningham, J.,

This is an action by a common carrier to recover an inadvertent undercharge in interstate freight rates resulting from an improper classification of two carloads of iron boiler tubes as scrap iron.

On December 6, 1935, the Empire Iron and Metal Company of Granville, N. Y. shipped ¡two carloads of boiler tubes to Philadelphia, Pa. The initial) carrier, Delaware and Hudson Railroad, issued uniform order bills of lading covering the shipments under which the tubes were consigned to the order of the shipper, “Notify B. H. Sobelman”; they also bore a notation— “For export.”…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Pennsylvania R.R. Co. v. . TitusNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. West Jersey & Seashore R. R. v. Whiting Lumber Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dodge v. BloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Dorsey v. MartinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Strawbridge & Clothier v. Garment Manufacturers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. FeldbaumSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. Schelly v. GribbinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API