Legal Opinion

Strawbridge & Clothier v. Garment Manufacturers, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1959No. Appeal, No. 404PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

Plaintiff, Strawbridge & Clothier, brought an action in assumpsit against defendants, Garment Manufacturers, Inc. and Sol Sardinsky as a third party beneficiary of a certain agreement. On November 2, 1956, Ralph Tudesco became indebted to plaintiff in the amount of $2,573.06 for goods sold and delivered. He was then the owner of all the capital stock of Garment Manufacturers, Inc. Appellant, Sol Sardinsky, acting as a representative for certain purchasers undisclosed entered into a written agreement with Tudesco to purchase all of Tudesco’s shares of stock of Garment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gill's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  2. Pennsylvania Railroad v. RothsteinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Penna. Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Nether Providence Township Sewer District Assessment CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. Reading Co. v. SobelmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horizon Financial, F.A. v. HansenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
  2. Montgomery County ex rel. Becker v. Merscorp, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Mikael Judah and Laura Judah v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  4. Mikael Judah and Laura Judah v. EMC Mortgage Corporation, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API