Legal Opinion

REPUYAN

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1984No. ID 2971PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #2971 MATTER. OF REPUYAN In Visa Petition Proceedings A-22783148 A-22783147 Decided by Board July 10, 1.984 A reading of the plain language and legislative history of section 101(b)(1)(E) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(1XE) (1982), establishes that Congress intended that the 2- year residence requirement vis-a-vis an adopted child connote a fa- milial relationship not inherent in a mere visit; therefore, a peti- tioner fails to meet his burden of proof in visa petition proceedings by merely showing a succession of visits by the adopting parent in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. BRANTIGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
  2. YUENBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972
  3. TANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1972
  4. Moge ex rel. Burns v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. HOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1988
  2. R. HUANGBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2015
  3. CUELLOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1989
  4. Zina v. RobinsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API