Legal Opinion
R. HUANG
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2015No. ID 3844PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 627
(BIA 2015) Interim Decision #3844 Matter of R. HUANG, Beneficiary of a visa petition filed by Mei Huang, Petitioner Decided July 8, 2015 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals The beneficiary of a visa petition who was adopted pursuant to a State court order that was entered when the beneficiary was more than 16 years old, but with an effective date prior to his or her 16th birthday, may qualify as an adopted child under section 101(b)(1)(E)(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1101(b)(1)(E)(i)…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Thomas Alan SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- BRANTIGANBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1966
- Miguel Noel Fierro v. Janet Reno, Attorney General, Miguel Noel Fierro v. Janet Reno, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Adebowale Ojo v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- Brown v. Dep't of Homeland Sec.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018
- Macfadyen v. Department of Homeland Security, Secretary ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Saiydah Sholanke v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Servs.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021