Legal Opinion
In Re Initiative Petition No. 10
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 30, 1940No. 29123PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
This appeal is from the findings of the city clerk of the sufficiency of initiative petition No. 10 of the city of Oklahoma City, which petition related to the adoption of an ordinance fixing the number of members of its board of education, and regulating the time and manner of their election. (Sections 5874, 5887, O. S. 1931, 34 Okla. Stat. Ann. §§ 8, 51.) The protest filed before the city clerk properly related entirely to the sufficiency of the initiative petition. Norris v. Cross, 25 Okla. 287, 309, 105 P. 1000, 1008.
On hearing de novo before the referee of this court (In re Initiative…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Threadgill v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Norris v. Cross, Secretary of StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 2 of CushingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- In Re Initiative State Question No. 10Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 315, State Question No. 553Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Shelton v. LambertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- McCartney v. TurpenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- OKLAHOMA INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ASSOCIATION v. POTTSSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 315, State Question No. 553Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.