Legal Opinion
McCartney v. Turpen
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided August 13, 1984No. 62780PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, Justice
The primary issue presented is the sufficiency of the proposed ballot title of State Question Number 563. If the question is approved by the voters, the Okla. Const. *401art. 271 will be repealed, and the voters in each county will determine, on a county option basis, whether to authorize retail sales of liquor by the drink.
The ballot title, which was written by the Secretary of State, and submitted to the Superintendent of Public Instruction to be conformed to an eighth grade level of reading comprehension, has been certified by the Attorney General to be in harmony with the law. All the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 315, State Question No. 553Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Arthur v. City of StillwaterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 10Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Lipscomb v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Smalygo v. GreenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
- Canida v. Technotherm Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
- Hodges v. Hodges Electric & Air Conditioning, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Oldham v. OK Iron & MetalCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.