Legal Opinion

Pocahontas Consolidated Collieries Co. v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 18, 1912PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond, on a petition filed to have refunded a portion of the tax paid under protest on the recordation of a deed of trust. Judgment for the Commonwealth. Petitioner assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtCardwell, J.

The Pocahontas Consolidated Collieries Company, Incorporated,, filed its petition in the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond, to have refunded to it $13,295.64, being a part of a tax of $20,000-which the petitioner claims to have been erroneously demanded by, and which it paid to, the clerk of the Circuit Court of Tazewell county involuntarily and under protest.

The facts are as follows: The Pocahontas Collieries Company and the Pocahontas Collieries Co., Inc., corporations under the laws, of the State of Virginia, on the 10th day of June, 1907, by joint agreement between the said companies,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nicol v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Eyre v. JacobSupreme Court of Virginia · 1858
  3. Bradley & Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1910
  4. Woodall v. City of LynchburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902
  5. Scottish Union & National Insurance v. City of WinchesterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1909

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wheeler v. WeightmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Trustees', Executors' & Securities Ins. v. HootonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Franklin Society for Home Building & Savings v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. City of Richmond v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. Saville v. Virginia Railway & Power Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1913

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API