Legal Opinion

Bradley & Co. v. City of Richmond

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 13, 1910PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Hustings Court of the city of Richmond, affirming a judgment of the police justice, imposing a fine on the plaintiff in error.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

In this case E. S. Bradley complains of a judgment rendered against him by the Hustings Court for the city of Richmond, to which the whole matter of law and fact was submitted, affirming a judgment of the police justice imposing upon him a fine of $25.00 and costs for conducting the business of a private banker without having paid the license tax of $800 assessed against him for the privilege.

The plaintiff in error contends that the council of the city of Richmond did not designate the daily newspaper in which the ordinance imposing the penalty in this case was to be published, and that…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. City of Norfolk v. Norfolk Landmark Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1898
  3. King v. Portland CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Morgan v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  5. Newport News & Old Point Railway & Electric Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Hunton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
  2. Jones v. GordyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  3. Richmond Linen Supply Co. v. City of LynchburgSupreme Court of Virginia · 1933
  4. Pocahontas Consolidated Collieries Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1912
  5. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API