Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Heiter

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 23, 1939No. 1 Div. 994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

A bill in equity was filed in this case for the sale of six parcels of property in Mobile for division among the tenants in common. It alleges, as amended, that complainant and respondents Edward Moneagle, Daniel P. Moneagle and James Mone-agle each own an one-sixth interest in all said property: that Annie Erichsen died leaving respondents Julius Erichsen, Helen Erichsen and Willie Mae Weir as her sole heirs at law, and each own an one-eighteenth interest; that respondent Margaret Thompson claims an one-sixth interest in it all, and that she is a tenant in common with the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Carl v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
  2. Leddon v. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Louisiana State Life Ins. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  5. Gore v. DickinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ellis v. StickneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
  2. Shaddix v. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Sisson v. SwiftSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  4. Box v. BoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Thompson v. HeiterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API