Sisson v. Swift
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The bill as amended was to quiet title. It is filed against the land as a proceeding in rem, and against the respondents. That pleading complies with the required allegation under § 9912 et seq., Code 1923, Code 1940, T. 7, § 1116, and was a compliance with § 9905 et seq., Code 1923, Code 1940, T. 7, § 1109 et seq. The latter is the statute long prevailing to quiet title.
The Act of October 1, 1923, Acts 1923, p. 699, known as the Grove Act and entitled, “To provide for the establishment of titles to real estate by a proceeding in rem,” has been codified in §§ 1109 to 1115,…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
- Carver v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
- Welsh v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1875
- Chapman v. AbrahamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1878
- Ex parte JonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Rollan v. PoseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
- Gilmer v. GilmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Merchants Nat. Bank of Mobile v. MorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Sansom v. SturkieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
- Hill v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.