Legal Opinion

Leddon v. Strickland

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 11, 1928No. 4 Div. 381PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The question presented as to said land on former appeal was that the widow, having by deed with general covenants of warranty sold and conveyed real estate of the deceased husband, thereafter could not institute proceedings under the statute (section 4224, Code of 1907; section 7948, Code of 1923) to have the same set aside as exempt to her. Strickland v. Hinson, 213 Ala. 401, 104 So. 766; Thompson v. Miller, 204 Ala. 502, 85 So. 689. After this decision complainants filed the original bill with its exhibits thereto and as a part thereof. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lbr. Co., 217 Ala. 159,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Grimsley v. First Ave. Coal & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  2. Sandlin v. AndersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Clark v. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  4. Doe ex dem. Shelton v. CarrolSupreme Court of Alabama · 1849
  5. Whitehead v. BoutwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Ratliff v. RatliffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Williams v. AnthonySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Compton v. CookSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Smith v. ColpackSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Childs v. JulianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API