Legal Opinion

Rice v. . Schneck

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 9, 1920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 26, 1919, which reversed an order of Special Term denying defendant’s motion for judgment in his favor upon the pleadings and granted said motion.

Read the full summary

Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 26, 1919, which reversed an order of Special Term denying defendant’s motion for judgment in his favor upon the pleadings and granted said motion. The action was brought to have certain agreements for the loan of money adjudged void upon the ground of usury and to recover certain stock pledged as collateral security for the payment of such loans together with the amount of interest paid in excess of six per cent per annum. The answer was substantially a general denial of .the…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Collin, Hogan, Pound, McLaughlin, Andrews and Elkus, JJ.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Halsey v. WinantNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  2. New York Credit Men's Ass'n v. Manufacturers Discount Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Yormark v. WaldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Fort v. 415 Central Park West Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1928
  5. In re the Estate of SextonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API