Legal Opinion

Yormark v. Waldman

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

Upon the argument it was virtually conceded that the denials in the answer raised no issue. The sole question for decision is whether the defenses and counterclaim are sufficient. The action is to foreclose a mortgage. The answering defendants have a lien on the property that is subordinate to the plaintiffs’ mortgage. The defenses and counterclaim attempt to challenge the validity of the mortgage on the claim that it was tainted with usury. The answer asks that the complaint be dismissed and the bond and mortgage adjudged void and canceled. The answering defendants were not parties to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Schermerhorn v. . TalmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
  2. Merchants Exchange National Bank v. Commercial Warehouse Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Williams v. . TiltNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
  4. Post v. DartNew York Court of Chancery · 1841
  5. Wheelock v. . LeeNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Del Rubio v. DuchesneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  2. PAC Construction Co. v. New York Factors, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1961
  3. Michaels v. SingleNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Besler v. Eldorado Cleaners, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1932
  5. North River Mortgage Corp. v. 254 Sixth Ave. Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API