Legal Opinion

Fort v. 415 Central Park West Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.

The first cause of action contains no allegations that the mortgage company did anything which it had no legal right to do. The agreement between it and the 415 Central Park West Corporation is not made part of the pleading, although it is referred to therein. In the absence of any allegation to that effect it cannot be assumed that any of its acts, now complained of, violated or were unauthorized by the agreement. Paragraph 19th alleges that the mortgage company required Roe to transfer his stock in the 415 Central Park West Corporation to it “ as a condition of excusing such defaults,”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noyes v. . WyckoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Rice v. SchneckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  3. Rice v. . SchneckNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. New York Credit Men's Ass'n v. Manufacturers Discount Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1945
  2. In re MillerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API