Legal Opinion

Brudi v. Trentman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1896No. 1,799PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Allen Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

On January 27, 1869, the appellant executed his promissory note payable to B. Trentman & Son, a copartnership, of which firm the appellee is the surviving partner. The note was due one day after date and was given for the sum of $629.68. This suit was instituted on July 7th, 1890, to recover a balance alleged to be due thereon. The complaint shows that several payments had been made and credited upon the note. The last payment being for $400.00 and made on the 3d day of December, 1886.

The defendant (appellant) filed seven paragraphs of answer; the first, fifth, and sixth were afterwards…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kisler v. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Christian v. State ex rel. HeastonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Meitzler v. ToddIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peter & Burghard Stone Co. v. CarperIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Barrett v. SippIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Eilke v. RiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. MacMillan v. ClementsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  5. Nicholas v. PorterIndiana Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API