Legal Opinion

Hodgin v. . Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eurches, J.'

Tbis is a petition to rebear. Tbe same case was before tbe Court at February Term, and is reported in .24 N. C., 540, and it is now contended for defendant that the case should not be reheard, for that to do so would violate the rules of practice prescribed by this Court in Weathers v. Borders, 124 N. C., 610; Hudson v. Jordan, 110 N. C., 250; Tucker v. Tucker, Ibid, 333; Emry v. Railroad, 105 N. C., 45; Gay v. Grant, Ibid, 478; Watson v. Dodd, 72 N. C., 240, and Mullen v. Canal Co., 115 N. C., 15, where it is said that a case should not be reheard unless it shall appear that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jordan v. . National Shoe and Leather BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Watson v. . DoddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  3. Weathers v. BordersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  4. Hodgin v. Peoples' National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  5. Nelson v. HaynerIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Bandy v. FIRST STATE BANK, OVERTON, TEX.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hodgin v. Peoples' National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  3. State v. LewisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2005
  4. Lumberton v. . Hood, CommissionerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  5. Dameron v. . CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API