Legal Opinion

Dameron v. . Carpenter

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 2, 1925PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVarser, J.

In addition to tbe facts in this judgment it appears from tbe affidavit and complaint of tbe plaintiffs and tbe answer thereto by defendants, Carpenter and Fuller, that Carpenter does not deny, and Fuller admits, that 28 June, 1924, and prior to bis assignment of the" McLean mortgage to Carpenter, that plaintiffs offered to pay tbe mortgage indebtedness to Fuller by offering to credit oh tbe Fuller note held by plaintiffs tbe amount of tbe McLean note, and Fuller refused to accept this obligation in payment. Tbe alleged reason for such refusal is that tbe McLean note was in fact tbe property…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harrison v. . BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. New Bern Cotton Oil & Fertilizer Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Porter v. MilletMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1812
  4. Baker v. Bishop Hill ColonyIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Battle v. . ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coburn v. . CarstarphenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Harvey v. Kinston Knitting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  3. In Re Bank of SampsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Elliott v. CarrollSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934
  5. Bank of Onslow v. Rowland Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API