Legal Opinion

Weathers v. Borders

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 5, 1899PublishedCited by 23 opinions

PetitioN to Keheae. Case reported in 121 N. C., 389.

1Opinion of the CourtFueches, J.

This case was heard, at Fall Term, 1897, and is reported in 121 N. C., 389.

It has been held that a petition to rehear a case, which had been decided by this Court, should contain a plain, concise statement of the facts or law overlooked, or erroneously decided; but that it should not undertake to establish such alleged errors by a course of reasoning. White v. Jones, 92 N. C., 388.

This petition is an argument containing ten pages of printed matter with citation of authorities to sustain the argument, and was used as a brief by the petitioner in his argument. This rule may not always have been…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Farthing v. . ShieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Dougherty v. . SprinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Hughes v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  4. Thurber. Whyland & Co. v. LaRoqueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Watson v. . DoddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Kearney v. . VannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  2. Brown v. . WardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Southern Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. Stephens v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Cansler v. . PenlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API