People v. Champion
California Court of Appeal
1Dissent
FILES, P. J., Dissenting in part.
—I concur in the reversal as to Henry, but would affirm Champion’s conviction.
Champion was seen driving the Pontiac just 16 hours after its owner had locked up. It is a reasonable inference that a person driving such a vehicle so soon after the theft is the person who took it. This was a relatively new and valuable car. Ownership of an automobile does not pass casually from hand to hand, like cigarettes, liquor or neckties. The defendant could not have purchased it, for motor vehicles are not salable without the ownership certificate. It is possible to borrow…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. CockrellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.