Legal Opinion
Rittenhouse v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 25, 1957No. 36853PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.
It is contended by counsel for the plaintiff in error that, due to certain irregularities, the depositions of Dr. Thompson taken by counsel for the employer were erroneously considered. The record shows that at the commencement of the hearing counsel for the employer moved to continue for the purpose of taking additional medical testimony, stating they would like for claimant to be examined by Dr. Thompson of Chattanooga. The director stated: “Yes sir, we will leave the file open for additional medical testimony and give you 20 days in which to take that. Mr. Tarver, you understand the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. SissonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Atlanta Transit System, Inc. v. HarcourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
- Hurt v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Travelers Insurance v. HutchensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Neal v. Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Reliance Insurance Co. v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- Travelers Insurance v. HutchensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962