American Mutual Liability Insurance v. Williams
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.
1. There are two questions for determination: (a) Did the court err in affirming the award in view of the fact that the defendants were denied the right of cross-examination? (b) Was the director authorized under the evidence to find and order the defendants to pay medical expenses? Unless the court committed reversible error in one of these particulars, the case should be affirmed. We will deal with these questions in the order named.
There were several hearings in the ease, and both parties were represented by counsel. Both parties introduced expert medical testimony — the claimant by his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Mutual Liability Insurance v. SissonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Jones v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- American Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. LindseyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. O'ByrneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rittenhouse v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
- Frier v. South Carolina PenitentiarySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
- General Motors Corp. v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959