Travelers Insurance v. Hutchens
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Ebbrhardt, Judge.
The primary question in this case revolves around a hypothetical question asked of the medical witnesses. The question related the physical facts set out above but also assumed that the decedent had lifted the die to the lathe. One of the doctors testified in response to the hypothetical question that the exertion of lifting the die did precipitate a coronary occlusion, which opinion is sufficient to support the award in this respect. U. S. Cas. Co. v. Thomas, 106 Ga. App. 441 (127 SE2d 169). The employer insists that it was not proven that the decedent lifted the die and…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. SaulSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Employers Liability Assurance Corp. v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. HickmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
- Kuttner v. SwansonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Ellis v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hyles v. CockrillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Shannon v. KaylorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Warmack v. Mini-Skools Ltd.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Stoneridge Properties, Inc. v. KuperCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Bowers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.