Legal Opinion

Cox v. Kentucky Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 2, 1995No. 93-6226PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.

PlaintiffrAppellant Charles Cox initiated this action against the Kentucky Department of Transportation (“DOT”) and several of its officials under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1978 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621, et seq.; under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and under Kentucky state law, 18A K.R.S. § 140. Plaintiff asserted that the appellees conspired to limit his promotions from 1980 to 1992 because of his age and political affiliation. The district court granted summary judgment on the ADEA issue, concluding that the ADEA was not applicable to the individual…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Terry Summers v. Simon Leis, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  2. Williams v. MehraCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  3. Williams v. BelknapDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  4. Yanacos v. LAKE COUNTY, OHDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  5. Gaddis Ex Rel. Gaddis v. Redford TownshipDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API