Legal Opinion

In re Haley B.

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 13, 2004No. AC 22274PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HENNESSY, J.

The intervening respondent, the maternal grandmother of Haley B.,1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying her motion to transfer guardianship or custody of her minor granddaughter from the petitioner, the commissioner of children and families (commissioner), to her. On appeal, the respondent claims that (1) the decision was not based on facts or on a reasonable interpretation of the evidence, (2) the court failed to apply the appropriate legal standard to the facts of the case and (3) the court abused its discretion by improperly relying on hearsay statements.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re Hector L.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  2. In re Joshua S.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  3. In re Haley B.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  4. In re Shyina B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  5. In re Cynthia A.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haggerty v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. Cooke v. CookeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
  3. In re A.R.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. In re Etta H.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. Lareau v. BurrowsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API