In re A.R.
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The intervening respondent (intervenor), the maternal great-grandmother of A and M, minor children in the custody of the commissioner of children and families (commissioner), appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing her motion to transfer guardianship. Because we conclude that the court incorrectly treated the intervenor’s motion to transfer guardianship as a motion to revoke commitment and determined that an intervening party may not file a motion to revoke commitment, we reverse the judgment of the trial court dismissing the intervenor’s motion.
The following…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cruz v. MontanezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Commissioner of Social Services v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- In re Haley B.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
3Cited by5 opinions
- REID AND RIEGE, PC v. BulakitesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Fairchild Heights Residents Ass'n v. Fairchild Heights, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Sinchak v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Marchesi v. BOARD OF SELECTMEN OF LYMEConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Marchesi v. BOARD OF SELECTMEN OF LYMEConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011