Legal Opinion

Fennessy Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1957No. Appeal, No. 219PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The claimant, 52 years of age, had worked for Lansdale Porcelain Enamel Corporation for about eight months. On October 19, 1955, he reported off from work and returned to his home in Locust Dale for the purpose of a physical check-up by his family doctor. After the examination he remained under the care of his personal physician until October 30, 1956. Claimant’s work as a shearing machine operator, consisted in lifting heavy pieces of metal and placing them upon the machine to be cut into smaller size. When cut, it then was a part of claimant’s job to put the metal pieces…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ambridge Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Vernon Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. O'Donnell Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Zielinski Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. Antinopoulas Unempl. Comp. CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Genetin v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Allen v. Core Target City Youth ProgramCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Tollari v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Genetin v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Davis v. StewartCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API