Tollari v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of Review
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Blatt,
All of the claimants herein are retired employees of the Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corporation (employer) and are seeking unemployment compensation benefits. The claims are based on the ground that, although the retirements were voluntary, they were occasioned by causes of a necessitous and compelling nature, and so entitle the claimants to benefits. Even though the claimants retired at various times, the fact situation in each case is virtually identical, and all cases, therefore, will be considered together. Each claimant contends that he retired, not because of any…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kernisky v. Unempl. Comp. Bd. of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Philadelphia Coke Division, Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Pfafman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Pellegrino v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- United States Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Genetin v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Stalc v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Steffy v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Elshinnawy v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.