Legal Opinion

Ontai v. Straub Clinic & Hospital Inc.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1983No. NOS. 7237 & 7342PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

MENOR, J.

This is a consolidated appeal by plaintiff Francis Ontai (“Ontai”) from the directed verdict entered against him by the lower court in favor of defendant-appellee General Electric Company (“G.E.”), and by defendant Straub Clinic and Hos pital, Inc. (“Straub”) from the dismissal of its cross-claim against G.E.

On March 1,1976, plaintiff Ontai went to Straub for an air contrast barium enema examination of the colon. The examination took place in Room 62, also referred to as Room 2, of Straub. This examination involved taking X-rays of Ontai in various positions,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Daly v. General Motors Corp.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Cronin v. J.B.E. Olson Corp.California Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Masaki v. General Motors Corp.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Tabieros v. Clark Equipment Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Potter v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Dart v. Wiebe Manufacturing, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API