Legal Opinion
Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 24, 1997No. 64715-1PublishedCited by 107 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
This case arises from transactions between John L. Scott (Scott), a real estate brokerage, its real estate agents, and Peter Sing, a real estate investor and prospective purchaser of real estate listed with Scott. Sing alleged that Scott violated the Consumer Protection Act and a jury found in Sing’s favor. Scott appeals a published Court of Appeals decision affirming the trial court’s denial of Scott’s motion for judgment as a matter of law. We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In July 1987, the Rudds listed their undeveloped Bainbridge Island property with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Industrial Indem. Co. of Northwest, Inc. v. KallevigWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Boeing Company v. Sierracin CorporationWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Douglas v. FreemanWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- Keyes v. BollingerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Kaufman v. I-Stat Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Sing v. John L. Scott, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Davis v. Microsoft Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Davis v. Microsoft Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
- Alejandre v. BullWashington Supreme Court · 2007
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.