Legal Opinion

Mitts & Merrill, Inc. v. Shred Pax Corp.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 7, 1986No. 79-C-3379PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ELAINE E. BUCKLO, United States Magistrate.

Plaintiff, Mitts & Merrill, Inc. (“Mitts”), seeks a declaration that certain patents licensed by it under an exclusive license from defendants, Shred Pax Corporation and Alvis Kaczmarek (“Shred Pax”), are invalid. The patents are for trash shredding and compacting devices. Mitts also seeks a declaration that the machines made by it do not infringe Shred Pax’s patents and alleges that Mitts misrepresented the advances supposedly disclosed by the patents and failed to disclose that another manufacturer was making trash shredding devices that were…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lear, Inc. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Alfred B. Freeman v. Chicago Musical Instrument Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. International Electronics Corp. v. FlanzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. Mendenhall v. Barber-Greene Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1982
  5. Research Corp. v. Gourmet's Delight Mushroom Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spence v. FlyntWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. VLT Corp. v. Unitrode Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
  3. Meyer v. Iowa Mold Tooling Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
  4. Jamie Hicks v. City of LaSalle, an Illinois municipal corporation, Jeff Grove, in his individual and official capacities as Mayor of LaSalle, et al.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2026
  5. Spence v. FlyntWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API