Legal Opinion

Greenberg v. Ginsberg

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 15, 1913PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from an order of the City Court of the city of New York denying the motion of the defendant Harry Ginsberg to vacate and set aside a judgment entered in favor of the respondents on the 3d day of March, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The plaintiffs furnished labor and material to the Gingold Realty Company, a corporation, and received in payment a number of promissory notes exe*416cuted by the Gingold Realty Company as maker, payable to the order of the plaintiffs and indorsed by Abraham J. Goldstein, Moses A. Goldstein and Harry Ginsberg, the appellant. After the maturity of these notes the plaintiff entered into an agreement in writing with the Gingold Realty Company and Abraham J. Goldstein, dated September 27, 19121, which provided that the Gingold Realty Company should execute and deliver to the plaintiffs a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Calvo v. . DaviesNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. National Park Bank v. . KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Dorlon v. ChristieNew York Supreme Court · 1862
  4. Pomeroy v. . TannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. GinsbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
  2. Kirchstein v. DreazenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API