Legal Opinion

Kirchstein v. Dreazen

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided February 7, 1927Published

1Opinion of the CourtPanken, J.

Erudite counsel cites the wisdom of King Solomon in support of the plaintiff’s position. King Solomon’s wisdom cannot be doubted, for he was indeed wise. He uttered many-poetic truths.

The plaintiff in this action is the payee of a promissory note made by Herman Dubrew and indorsed by the defendants herein. Dubrew is not made a party defendant.' The defendants are sought to be held by the plaintiff herein as such indorsers. The note was due on the 19th of October, 1922.

Both defendants deny that due notice of the dishonor of the paper by the maker has been given them. Plaintiff’s counsel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Park Bank v. . KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Union Trust Co. of New Jersey v. McCrumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Greenberg v. GinsbergAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API