Legal Opinion
Bank of Commerce v. Seattle
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided April 12, 1897No. 223, 224, 225, 226PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
166 U.S. 463 (1897)
BANK OF COMMERCE
v.
SEATTLE.
SEATTLE BANK
v.
SEATTLE.
PUGET SOUND BANK
v.
SEATTLE.
WASHINGTON BANK
v.
KING COUNTY.
Nos. 223, 224, 225, 226.
Supreme Court of United States.
Argued March 23, 1897.
Decided April 12, 1897.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON.
Mr. Harold Preston for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Eugene M. Carr and Mr. James B. Howe were with him on the briefs.
Mr. Andrew F. Burleigh for defendants in error in No. 226. Mr. James A. Haight and Mr. Samuel Piles were on his briefs.
Mr. John K. Brown for defendants in error in Nos. 223, 224 and 225. Mr. John B. Allen and…
Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Shiras.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- National Bank of Commerce v. City of Seattle SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
3Cited by11 opinions
- Merchants' Nat. Bank of Richmond v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- First National Bank of Wellington v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- People Ex Rel. Hanover National Bank v. GoldfogleNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- First National Bank v. County of DawsonMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- First National Bank v. City of HartfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.