National Bank of Commerce v. City of Seattle Seattle
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. The case is stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shiras
The bills of complaint in these cases are substantially of the same legal import, so far as any Federal question is concerned, with that considered in the case of The First National Bank of Aberdeen v. The County of Chehalis, ante, 440, in which the opinion of this court has just been delivered.
The only difference that we notice is that, in connection with the allegation that there existed large amounts of taxable moneyed capital owned by resident citizens and invested in interest-bearing loans and securities, there is made' the ad ditional allegation that all of said- other moneyed capital…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- National Accident Society v. SpiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Bank of Commerce v. SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- First National Bank v. County of DawsonMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- First Nat. Bank v. Louisiana Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Bank of Commerce v. SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- First National Bank v. City Council of EsthervilleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Farmers State Bank v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.