Legal Opinion
State v. Flanagan
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 31, 2006No. AC 24539PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DRANGINIS, J.
The defendant, Maurice Flanagan, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of conspiracy to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-59 (a) (1) and 53a-48 (a).1 On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict and (2) the court denied him the constitutional right to represent himself. We disagree and accordingly affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This appeal concerns another chapter in the hostile, violent and deadly rivalry between two street gangs, the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- United States v. William BentvenaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Joseph CalabroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- State v. CaracogliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. EdwardsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. WilliamsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. FlanaganConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.