Legal Opinion
State v. Decaro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 29, 2000No. SC 15891PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
A jury found the defendant, Rita DeCaro, guilty of nine counts of forgery in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-139 (a),1 and not guilty of three counts of larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123 (a) (4).2 The *232trial court rendered judgment in accordance with the jury verdict,3 and the defendant appealed.4 On appeal, the defendant claims that: (1) the evidence was insufficient to sustain her forgery convictions; (2) her forgery convictions cannot stand because they are inconsistent with her acquittal on the larceny charges;…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- United States v. Alex J. RaineriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Three S. Development Co. v. SantoreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. ManningSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. FaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.