Legal Opinion

Ute Distribution Corp. v. Secretary of the Interior of the United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 19, 2009No. 08-4147PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRISCOE, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff Ute Distribution Corporation (UDC) appeals from a decision of the district court denying UDC’s claim for a declaration that the Secretary’s implementation of the 1954 Ute Partition and Termination Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 677 et seq., did not provide for an equitable and practicable division and distribution of water rights between the “mixed-blood” and “full-blood” members of the Ute Indian Tribe, and that, consequently, such rights are currently held in trust by the Secretary for the mixed-blood members. 1 Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States & Interstate Commerce Commission v. American Railway Express Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Winters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. C.R. England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  2. Wyoming v. United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  3. Havens v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
  4. United Fire & Casualty Company v. Boulder Plaza Residential, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
  5. Kansas Natural Resource v. United States Dept of InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API