Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Dixon

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 26, 1979No. 37,440; CM 435789PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court'

FLETCHER, Chief Judge:

We are called upon in the granted issue sub judice to rule on the Army Court of Military Review’s production order and examination of documents properly requested 1 under the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, but improperly denied the defense at trial. We hold that inasmuch as the military judge failed to properly append the contested agent’s summary to the record of trial as mandated by the statute,2 the action taken by the United States Army Court of Military Review was necessary in order to test the judge’s action for prejudice.3

This case involves a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Palermo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Rosenberg v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. Fred Louis Bell and Charles Lavern BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. BosierU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. BoydU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. KilmonU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  4. United States v. JonesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. StrandU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API