Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert J. Giardino

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 29, 1986No. 07-2258PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREYER, Circuit Judge.

Robert Giardino brought a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, seeking to set aside his guilty plea to federal narcotics charges. 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846. He says that his plea is the product of ineffective assistance of counsel. More particularly, he says that his lawyer told him a lie; and, in the absence of the lie, he would have pleaded not guilty and insisted on a trial. The district court denied the § 2255 motion summarily. In our view, however, it should have allowed further proceedings.

When Giardino pleaded guilty, the government outlined its evidence. It expected…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. GinnCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. DykesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  3. Segura v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Grosvenor v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  5. Bobby J. Key v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API