Legal Opinion

Kamal Muhammad v. Warden Bailey, et al.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 26, 2026No. 1:23-cv-00955Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND KAMAL MUHAMMAD, * Petitioner, * v. * Civ. No. DLB-23-955 WARDEN BAILEY, et al., * Respondents. * MEMORANDUM OPINION Kamal Muhammad filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF 1. The respondents filed an answer to the petition, asserting it must be dismissed because Muhammad’s claims either are procedurally defaulted or lack merit. ECF 19. No hearing is necessary. See Rule 8(a), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases in the U.S. Dist. Cts.; Loc. R. 105.6 (D. Md. 2025); see also Fisher v. Lee,

215 F.3d 438,…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API