Legal Opinion

Fiddelman v. Redmon

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 4, 1995No. 12489PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether the termination of a birdnesting arrangement by giving the plaintiff exclusive possession of the marital home constituted a modification of the dissolution property distribution order or a modification of the custody and visitation order. The trial court found that it was a modification of the custody and visitation order, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The pertinent facts are as follows. After a lengthy trial, the marriage of the parties was dissolved on June 13, 1991. Both sought sole legal custody of their two minor children, bom January…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Krasnow v. KrasnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  2. Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Bunche v. BuncheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Viglione v. ViglioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  5. Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. McDonnell v. McDonnell, No. Fa 94 0535761 S (Feb. 2, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API