Fiddelman v. Redmon
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The issue in this appeal is whether the termination of a birdnesting arrangement by giving the plaintiff exclusive possession of the marital home constituted a modification of the dissolution property distribution order or a modification of the custody and visitation order. The trial court found that it was a modification of the custody and visitation order, and we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The pertinent facts are as follows. After a lengthy trial, the marriage of the parties was dissolved on June 13, 1991. Both sought sole legal custody of their two minor children, bom January…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Krasnow v. KrasnowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Blake v. BlakeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Bunche v. BuncheSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Viglione v. ViglioneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Jaser v. JaserConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fiddelman v. RedmonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- McDonnell v. McDonnell, No. Fa 94 0535761 S (Feb. 2, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999