Legal Opinion
McMullen v. Synchrony Bank
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 13, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-1983PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Valerie McMullen has moved to remand this action to the Superior Court of the District of Columbia or, in the alternative, for limited discovery related to her motion to remand. Defendant JP Morgan Chase & Co. (“Chase”) resists remand and discovery, claiming that this Court has jurisdiction under the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), .28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). 1 Upon careful consideration of the motion and the parties’ memoranda, 2 the applica ble law, and the record, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. KnowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Mississippi Ex Rel. Hood v. AU Optronics Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Hart v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bradford v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Jane Doe 1 v. Georgetown Synagogue-Kesher Israel CongregationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Chemical Toxin Working Group Inc. v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Lavelle v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- McMullen v. Synchrony BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.