Legal Opinion

Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 15, 2014No. 13-719PublishedCited by 711 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Ginsburg

To remove a case from a state court to a federal court, a defendant must file in the federal forum a notice of removal "containing a short and plain statement of the grounds for removal." 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a). When removal is based on diversity of citizenship, an amount-in-controversy requirement must be met. Ordinarily, "the matter in controversy [must] excee[d] the sum or value of $75,000." § 1332(a). In class actions for which the requirement of diversity of citizenship is relaxed, § 1332(d)(2)(A)-(C), "the matter in controversy [must] excee[d] the sum or value of $5,000,000," § 1332(d)(2).…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by711 opinions

  1. Lincoln Benefit Life Co. v. AEI Life, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. Jose Ibarra v. Manheim Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  4. Grant Fritsch v. Swift Transportation Co. of AzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Blanca Argelia Arias v. Residence Inn by MarriottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

706 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API