Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Paniagua
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided July 2, 2013No. 1:11-cv-01229-JDB-egbPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS1 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
J. DANIEL BREEN, District Judge.
Before this Court are Plaintiff, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s London (“Lloyd’s”), and Defendants, William Paniagua, Crane Contractors LLC d/b/a Contractors Inc. (“Crane”), CLK Multi Family Management, LLC (“CLK”), and Consolidated American Services, Inc. d/b/a Creek-stone Apartments’ (“Creekstone”), cross-motions for summary judgment. (Docket Entry (“D.E.”) 65, 67, 68, 70.) The parties seek a declaratory judgment as to whether Lloyd’s is liable to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- In Re: Marilyn E. Morris, Debtor. John Poss v. Marilyn E. MorrisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Steadfast Investments and Properties, LLC v. AmGUARD Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2024
- Steadfast Investments and Properties, LLC v. Amguard Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2026