Subsequent Injury Fund v. Grant
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PIERCE.
The Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Office (Panel) which ordered it to pay 70% of the permanent total disability benefits payable to claimant, Daryl Grant. We affirm.
Claimant was rendered permanently and totally disabled from the combined effect of a prior back injury, preexisting industrial carpal tunnel syndrome, and a subsequent industrial injury to his shoulder. The Panel determined that 50% of claimant’s disability was attributable to the prior back injury, 20% was attributable to the preexisting carpal…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ingram v. CooperSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Frohlick Crane Service, Inc. v. MacKSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
- Gelco Courier v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Ragsdale Bros. Roofing, Inc. v. United Bank of Denver, N.A.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1987
- Casa Bonita Restaurant v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Niemet v. General Electric Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Subsequent Injury Fund v. GrantColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- Electron Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
- In re the Marriage of CargillColorado Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.