Legal Opinion
Subsequent Injury Fund v. Grant
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 10, 1991No. 89CA1428PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge PIERCE.
This case is before us pursuant to a mandate from our supreme court in Subsequent Injury Fund v. Grant, 812 P.2d 1176 (Colo.1991), which vacated our decision in Subsequent Injury Fund v. Grant, 812 P.2d 1183 (Colo.App. 1991), and directed us to again review a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel which ordered the Subsequent Injury Fund (SIF) to pay 70% of the permanent total disability benefits payable to claimant, Daryl Grant. In accordance with Climax Molybdenum Co. v. Walter, 812 P.2d 1168 (Colo.1991), we set aside the order and remand.
Claimant was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Gelco Courier v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Casa Bonita Restaurant v. Industrial CommissionColorado Court of Appeals · 1981
- Seifried v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF STATEColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Savio House v. DennisColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Delta Drywall v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of the StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Monfort, Inc. v. RangelColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Electron Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1992